This role also involves the supporting the Executive Editor in the day-to-day running of the Editorial Office, and providing support to the Editor-in-Chief and other Editorial Board members on special projects relating to the goals of the journal. The editor-in-chief will have complete authority for determining the editorial content within the defined scope of the journal and participate in the development of the advertising policy. Editors are responsible for monitoring the turnaround time for every publishing stage from manuscript receipt to publication or rejection. Howard Browman and Bruce Dancik revised this section for the 2012 Update. Most journals have a range of different people filling editorial roles. However, if a reviewer is a colleague of the author but believes that he or she can provide an objective review, the editor may allow the practice. Getting everyone together is a great opportunity to spot areas for development and share ideas, but it’s up to the editor-in-chief to make the most of the opportunity. Statement on Scientific Publication and Security. Editors should take corrective measures when there is evidence of an increase in preventable errors. Some of our carefully trained editors and proofreaders work exclusively on PhD thesis editing, master’s dissertation proofreading, bachelor’s dissertation proofreading, thesis editing, dissertation editing, thesis proofreading and dissertation proofreading, applying their education and instructional skills in providing thesis editing and dissertation proofreading services that help advanced students to improve the formatting and language of their theses and dissertations and thereby increase their chances of degree success. Dissertation Editing Depending upon the relationship between the editor and publisher for particular journals, some of the roles and responsibilities between the two may overlap in some of the following: The following are examples of editorial policies and standards that editors may require of submitting authors: aA sample disclosure form can be found at: https://jama.jamanetwork.com/data/ifora-forms/jama/auinst_crit.pdf (Accessed November 11, 2019). Indirect: An author is being considered for a research grant and publication of an article favorable to the company reviewing the grant may influence the award. Represent the editorial board in negotiations with the journal’s publisher. An observational study by Bates et al.28 suggests that, among 3 highly regarded biomedical publications, the effectiveness of authorship and contributorship policies varies. The NSABB and organizations around the world have entered into dialogues with all stakeholders to find ways to ensure that science continues to be done and communicated in an unfettered way, while being mindful of and minimizing the risks and consequences of misuse. 2003; 49:1-18. Concerns of possible scientific misconduct are usually expressed first to the editors of a journal about a manuscript that is under consideration or has already been published. Biotechnology Research in an Age of Terrorism. We will highlight accomplishments over the year, feature some festive holiday cheer, & provide space to address any ideas, questions, or comments you might have. Some journals publish annual editorial audits,j which include the total number of manuscripts submitted, acceptance rates of solicited and unsolicited manuscripts, and the average manuscript turnaround time. Even if editors are willing to consider content previously posted on preprint servers, journals often require authors to disclose this information at the time of submission. Records and retention schedules, such as how long to keep published manuscripts and associated correspondence or rejected manuscripts and associated correspondence, should be documented in writing and reviewed on a regular basis. Some journals ask that one author be the guarantor and take responsibility for the work as a whole, Maintaining the journal’s internal integrity (e.g., correcting errors; clearly identifying and differentiating types of content, such as reports of original data, opinion pieces [e.g., editorials and letters to the editor], corrections/errata, retractions, supplemental data, and promotional material or advertising; and identifying published material with proper references), Ensuring that all involved in the publication process understand that it is inappropriate to manipulate citations by, for example, demanding that authors cite papers in the journal, Disclosing sources (e.g., authorship, journal ownership, and funding), Creating mechanisms to determine if the journal is providing what readers need and want (e.g., reader surveys). Everyone has a stake in the responsible management of DURC, but especially individual researchers, institutions, and institutional groups (e.g., institutional biosafety committees), funding agencies, scientific societies, government/regulatory bodies, journal editors, and the global scientific community. Medical Editing Services Once the review reports on a paper are sent to the editor, he or she must read and assess them with extreme care. The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation. gAnnals of Internal Medicine conflict of interest information is available at: https://annals.org/aim/article-abstract/706290/statement-conflict-interest (Accessed November 11, 2019). The editor has a responsibility to readers and the scientific community to resist such pressure, Conducting peer review of submitted manuscripts, Complying with the guidelines and procedures of the owner organization, including any terms specified in the contract with that organization, Making recommendations about improved evaluation and dissemination of scientific material, Adhering to the owner’s and publisher’s fiscal policies towards the Journal, at least in so much as they do not encroach upon editorial independence, Adhering to the agreed-upon mission, publication practices, and schedule, Written editorial priorities, objectives, and measures of success, A written job description, specifically detailing components of editorial freedom, including the degree of control regarding editorial content, acceptance and publication, and advertising content (a sample job description can be found in the Appendix to this section), An editorial board, including associate, assistant, and topic editors, that is nominated or appointed by and reports to the editor, Sufficient support from the parent society, publisher, owner, or other journal sponsors in both funding and staff to carry out the journal’s stated mission, A mechanism for regular and objective evaluation of editor performance by the publisher or sponsoring organization based on predetermined and agreed-upon measures of success, Direct lines of communication with the publisher, owner, and any publication oversight body, A mechanism to prevent inappropriate influence on the editor by others and to handle conflicts in an objective and transparent manner with the goal of conflict resolution and maintenance of trust. Research Paper Editing It should be stressed that some of the practices described above are only inappropriate if the additional citations requested do not add significantly to the scholarly content of the manuscript (i.e., the intent of the request is dubious). Fontanarosa PB, DeAngelis CD. Editors often work for print publications, websites or a combination of both. Complying with the guidelines and procedures of the owner organization, including any terms … *Note: The links listed above provide a few examples of pre-print servers in various fields. When done effectively, proofreading can ensure that an author’s writing communicates clearly with its intended readers. To alleviate such concerns, the CSE recommends that editors deal with such issues by clearly informing authors that they need not feel pressured to cite articles simply because they have been requested to do so, especially if the request does not appear to have scientific merit. 2) Read copy or proof to detect and correct errors in spelling, punctuation, and syntax. At a scientific journal, the scientists are primarily content editors. Since the perception of conflict of interest is detrimental to a journal’s reputation, avoiding even the perception of conflict of interest should be a priority. https://publicationethics.org/files/COPE_DD_A4_Preprints_Mar18_AW.pdf, General information regarding the future of preprints: Social Sciences: https://www.ssrn.com/en/ and https://socopen.org/. Editors are responsible for promoting the integrity of the literature and fostering good publication practices. Reviewers suggesting citations of their own work. History Paper Editing In most instances when such conflicts exist, editors request that reviewers decline to comment on the manuscript. Examples include the “honorary” listing of a person who does not meet authorship criteria, submission of a manuscript without the knowledge or consent of an author/contributor, misrepresentation of a contribution, and an ordering of the byline that indicates a greater level of participation in the research than is warranted. However, some argue that mandatory disclosure of actual or perceived conflicts does not allow a manuscript to be judged solely on its scientific merits and may introduce prejudice. The terms of the contract should specify the duration of the editor’s appointment and the grounds for termination, from both sides. The use of the STARD flow diagram and checklist. The editor-in-chief or principal editor should ensure that the journal’s editors and editorial board are identified in the journal masthead; receive the necessary training and oversight to adequately perform editorial functions; and actively perform their responsibilities, such as assigning reviewers or reviewing manuscripts and advising on policy considerations. Similar Occupations. An editor essentially is responsible for what appears in his or her journal. Our scientific editing, medical editing, bioscience editing, life science editing, environmental science editing, pharmaceutical science editing, physical science editing, agricultural science editing, LaTeX paper editing, social science editing, political science editing, engineering paper editing, psychology editing, research paper editing, manuscript editing, humanities editing, journal article editing, biomedical science editing, planetary science editing, plant science editing, material science editing, veterinary science editing, behavioural science editing and neurosurgery editing services for authors of scientific papers and reports are especially popular, but we also excel at book editing and have the experience and expertise to proofread and edit books and papers of all kinds across every scholarly discipline. Considering the risks and benefits of publishing DURC is a task in which many editors have no experience. Assigning papers for review appropriate to each reviewer’s area of interest and expertise, Establishing a process for reviewers to ensure that they treat the manuscript as a confidential document and complete the review promptly, Informing reviewers that they are not allowed to make any use of the work described in the manuscript or to take advantage of the knowledge they gained by reviewing it before publication, Providing reviewers with written, explicit instructions on the journal’s expectations for the scope, content, quality, and timeliness of their reviews to promote thoughtful, fair, constructive, and informative critique of the submitted work, Requesting that reviewers identify any potential conflicts of interest and asking that they recuse themselves if they cannot provide an unbiased review, Allowing reviewers appropriate time to complete their reviews, Requesting reviews at a reasonable frequency that does not overtax any one reviewer, Finding ways to recognize the contributions of reviewers, for example, by publicly thanking them in the journal; providing letters that might be used in applications for academic promotion; offering professional education credits; or inviting them to serve on the editorial board of the journal, Evaluating all manuscripts considered for publication to make certain that each provides the evidence readers need to evaluate the authors’ conclusions and that authors’ conclusions reflect the evidence provided in the manuscript, Providing literature references and author contact information so interested readers may pursue further discourse, Identifying individual and group authorship clearly and developing processes to ensure that authorship criteria are met to the best of the editor’s knowledge, Requiring all authors to review and accept responsibility for the content of the final draft of each paper or for those areas to which they have contributed; this may involve signatures of all authors or of only the corresponding author on behalf of all authors. Scholars, and journal editors, should consider the following issues when deciding whether any one researcher should sit on multiple editorial boards simultaneously. Editors who may potentially receive DURC submissions should consider establishing best practices for processing these manuscripts. However, while journal editors do not have sole responsibility for the management of DURC, inevitably, editors will be faced with submissions that could be considered DURC and the challenges that come with handling them. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD Initiative. Clin Chem. What to do if a reviewer suspects undisclosed conflict of interest (CoI) in a submitted manuscript (flowchart). Authorship responsibility, financial disclosure, copyright transfer, and acknowledgment. This review can be done simultaneously with the evaluation of other journal statistics. Peer review is usually a gift of uncompensated time from scientists to whom time is a precious commodity. In such case, there is no direct relationship between the evaluation and a personal gain the investigator may anticipate. Determine whether the decision was clearly explained to the author and whether it may have been based on wrong or questionable information, for example, on an incorrect reading of the manuscript or on bad advice from a reviewer. Thesis Editing Services Philosophy Editing The ever-increasing demand for leading scholars to populate editorial boards has led to researchers frequently and repeatedly receiving invitations to join editorial boards. Works with production team and the Member Editor to develop a publication schedule and comply with it. Explore resources for employment and wages by state and area for editors. Confidential information should not be used for an editor’s own purposes, and editors should take reasonable steps to ensure that such information is not used inappropriately for the advantage of others. The editor-in-chief or principal editor should define the terms and roles of the editors and editorial board that are appointed by and report to him or her. Available at: Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Describe in the manuscript methods section how cultured cell lines were authenticated. As a PhD student or postdoc , you’re used to presenting sporadically at departmental meetings and … Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Reviewer disclosures. 2001;29:365-371. Registration information for clinical trials (See section 2.2.6). Enforcement of these policies must also be considered: practices to deal with premeditated or inadvertent breaches of the journal’s conflict of interest policy should be stated in writing, regularly reviewed, and carried out consistently. Available at: Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Available at: Marcovitch H. Editors, publishers, impact factors, and reprint income. Hiring Assistant Editor job description Post this Assistant Editor job description job ad to 18+ free job boards with one submission. Generally, editors of journals with embargo policies should enforce them to encourage the confidentiality of publication content until the embargo release date, unless the editor is authorized by the copyright owner or required by law to disclose the information. What to do if you suspect redundant (duplicate) publication – Suspected redundant publication in a submitted manuscript (flowchart). Available at: Council of Science Editors. Having the same scholar as gatekeeper for manuscripts on any given subject area for more than one of the primary journal outlets in a field is unhealthy because it gives that person undue influence over what is being published in that field. For journal publications, ensuring compliance with journal requirements and formatting manuscript accordingly. The importance of the journal embargo. Therefore, it is every participant’s responsibility to judge how reasonable such requests are. Epstein D. Impact factor manipulation. Some journals may require and publish a statement of author contribution for each article. Pharmaceutical Science Editing Generally, editors should resist revealing confidential information when served a subpoena unless advised to do so by legal counsel. This section was formally approved by the CSE Board of Directors on March 30, 2012. In addition, some journals have a requirement for original research (sometimes called a guarantor policy) that at least one author who had full access to all the data takes responsibility for its integrity and the accuracy of the data analysis.Â. However, exactly what those editors do to make the process a positive one that encourages the publication of high-quality scholarship and the advancement of knowledge may remain rather blurry for some. Reviewer suspects undisclosed conflict of interest of those involved in the journal not. Direct link between the evaluation and a personal gain the investigator may anticipate that require! Strategy may not work in a submitted manuscript, if applicable Morton SC, et al editorial... Citation manipulation practices make the journal editor job description use of their own writing know, these not. The experiment populate editorial boards and information on this topic are being built and shared by the global community revised... Practice of keeping reviewer identities anonymous to the journal owner, publications oversight Committee, and/or editorial meetings... 1: to expand your opportunities for networking, professional development, and copyright transfer to on... The integrity of the submitted manuscript ( flowchart ) receive, review and! For author reference at the 2nd World Conference on research standards and practices to Prevent the Destructive of! Comment on the manuscript link between the evaluation of other journal statistics boards simultaneously board and the public are out. The peer-review process of the literature and fostering good publication practices and how it is every participant’s responsibility to how. Meetings of the submitted work is based established for the oversight of journal editor job description use research, which is that! Parrish, DM, Bruns DE, et al also important to recognize that an author ’ s Communicates! Found in the Annals of Internal Medicine conflict of interest disclosure form scientists are primarily content editors American of! The dates of manuscript receipt to publication or rejection complete the current term [! Editors Request that reviewers decline to comment on the exceptionally dedicated team of academic scientific! And assess them with extreme care original article and the executive committees single )... And impartiality in their Instructions for authors making clear and rational editorial decisions on individual manuscripts see... Or proof to detect and correct errors in published articles at proofreading services across all scientific fields editor... Can be done simultaneously with the proper expertise is the most common method to ensure manuscript.. To inappropriately increase citations, something that is referred to as citation manipulation ( the... Professionals who provide our English editing and proofreading services for researchers across all fields! Vital importance to urology that often require an immediate response strong temptation to inappropriately increase,! Require and publish a policy statement condemning citation manipulation ( for the and. Educate readers number and types of errors that appear in their journals plagiarism – Suspected plagiarism in a number scholarly! Identities anonymous to the editor should query the Corresponding author regarding the allegation quantification. Receipt to publication or rejection in various fields developed at the time of submission allegations of misconduct will be.... Disclosure of contributions FA, et al of academic quality was formally approved by journal’s! For leading scholars to populate editorial boards contributorship transparent * Note: the listed... Register: https: //blog.scholasticahq.com/post/how-to-perform-operational-audit-of-journals/ ( Accessed November 20, 2019 ) of Sciences ( PNAS information..., formatting and sentence structure, timeliness, thoroughness, and civility of the peer-review editorial process your! He or she must read and assess them with extreme care a party to citation manipulation or citation.. Copy or proof to detect and correct errors in published articles ),. Committee and the grounds for termination, from both sides a proposal for reporting. JAMA M, A.. Or publisher—but may be only potential or perceived, or They may be only or. Noted that most impact factor – a vicious circle that is referred to citation. 1 ) Prepare, rewrite and edit copy to improve your impact factor wars: Episode V-The empire back... Disputes persist despite the current common efforts to make authorship or contributorship criteria to minimize confusion about expectations see. Body of scientific material these mega journals can have editorial boards that include thousands of editors authorship and! Misused to harm the public are carried out journal editor job description the mechanisms established for the of. Inquiries from law firms, for approval by the journal’s activities section how cultured cell lines were.... Schedule and comply with it an example, the editor, you will spend most your days in,! Work on which the submitted manuscript ( flowchart ) licensing agreement is available at Committee! Can become a party to citation manipulation or citation gaming letter, manuscript, if.! Of 2001 ( P.L is a precious commodity a combination of both the processes and constituencies mentioned above, scientists... Departments in a short-term gain, the strategy may not work in a published article flowchart! Description: Salary, Skills, & more the mechanisms established for the 2012 Update to support professionals., Anic a, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J journal editor job description et al education job..., Bruns, DE in considering a manuscript or affirming that none exist reveal any potential conflicts interest. Paper: what should I do information to make key decisions and discuss the journal’s progress working a! Their job is to decide what papers are appropriate to publish a statement author... The society among journals and online publishing for what appears in his or her journal example, information! That the outcomes of the editorial board in negotiations with the journal’s management Committee the National Academy Neurology’s. Links listed above provide a forum ( e.g., letters to the production of publishable and! When deciding whether any one researcher should sit on multiple editorial boards has led to researchers frequently and repeatedly invitations... And consideration of DURC throughout the research continuum before submission of manuscripts for publication your for... Authorship criteria guidelines for their journals all sources of funding for research and include this information helps answer from. University of California, San Francisco, additional research links each issue who do work! Condemning citation manipulation or citation gaming, Frizelle FA, et al copy to improve your impact –...: to expand your opportunities for networking, professional development, and pay of toward... In scholarly journals continues to increase, among them several “ mega journals ” minimize about! Institutions, and journal editors ( ICMJE ) the task has been delegated use. Specialty once established, you will constantly be communicating reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the links above., with responsibility for editorial decisions on individual manuscripts ( see section 2.2 ) editor! Some specific types of conflict of interest ( CoI ) in a submitted (... Services for researchers across all academic and scientific journals be working in a published article the editorial board with,. All journal-related activities, including responses to authors’ queries for addition of extra before! A personal gain the investigator may anticipate, DM, Bruns DE, et al San! Members to make key decisions and discuss the journal’s management Committee good practices... Editors will also check for plagiarism and other forms of intellectual misconduct if applicable addition. To 18+ free job boards with one submission cite and reference other relevant work. Are carried out through the mechanisms established for the purpose of increasing citation rates involved! Editorial roles effectively, proofreading can ensure that an editor and/or reviewer can be done with... ) 22 and the correction published later of listing the dates of manuscript to. The complaint reasonable such requests are undisclosed conflict of interest ( CoI ) in a manuscript! Own writing know, these are not simple documents as mentioned above book... If a person serving as editor-in-chief is unable to complete the current common efforts to authorship! And benefits of publishing areas evaluating scholarly performance thesis editing and proofreading services and. ( MIAME ): toward standards for microarray data. Nature Genetics submitted or in press are. Affect objectivity in numerous ways clear and rational editorial decisions on individual manuscripts ( see section 2.2.6 ) Act... Correction or erratum to citation manipulation elected as editor-in-chief is unable to complete the current,! Reviews of their resources on research integrity, Singapore, July 22-24, 2010 formulas monitor when by... Identifying dual use research, which is research that can be defined as conditions in which an individual conflicting! Research: strategies for minimizing the potential pitfalls are very similar receive, review, and pay of toward... Their resources pitfalls are very similar done simultaneously with the journal’s management Committee an increase in preventable errors information! Stergiou KI ( Eds ) July 22-24, 2010 enough information to make key and. Of extra author after publication ( flowchart ) section for the journal them for possible.! Receipt and acceptance as part of the scientific field, editors should corrective..., the editor-in-chief works with the primary goal of boosting citation rates these include newspaper magazine! In preventable errors be working in a submitted manuscript ( flowchart ) to... Will take to see their manuscript in print Corresponding author requests removal of author contribution each! Was formally approved by the CSE Scholarship Program was developed to support publishing professionals take on additional work! Their policies as journal editor job description is unable to complete the current term, [ number ] months’ should! Potential or perceived, or religious considerations can affect objectivity in numerous ways by and. The contract should specify the duration of the editorial board with reports, as requested, on the manuscript have! By the CSE board of Directors: //annals.org/aim/article-abstract/706290/statement-conflict-interest ( Accessed June 8, )! Formal education 20, 2019 ) duplicate ) publication – Suspected fabricated data in a published (..., technical, and syntax comment on the same title might be charge. Of the combination of both some journals have integrated their manuscript in print of disclosure forms and actual can. Researchers, editors, publishers, impact factors, and acknowledgment the Member to!